Do you believe it can happen ?

According to NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming), your behaviours in an activity are affected by the beliefs and values you have associated to it. As an example, say you want to become better at public speaking (behaviour) and you take some classes, but despite all the training, deep down you don't believe you are any good at public speaking, then when it comes around to standing up to speak, your body will respond to your beliefs and your voice will waver, etc. Then, when you get some feedback, you'll filter it through those beliefs, e.g. if there are two people both of whom are equally talented but one has the belief that they are a great public speaker and the other that they are not, then if they both get told that they are really good, one will believe it and use that comment to reinforce their belief further, whereas the other won't believe it and will probably find a way to use it to back up their belief that they are not.

This is all well and good but what has this got to do with Stock market trading? Well, part of your success or failure is related to the beliefs you have. If you don't believe that you'll ever make a profit or successfully trade at a new level of outlay then you will find a way to make that happen. This is where self sabotage appears. Where you do something stupid, knowing it's stupid, but do it all the same. NLP offers lots of processes for changing beliefs but sometimes, just realising that a false belief is present, can help bring it to the surface so you can start breaking it down and challenging it.

Ideally, this is why you find those who succeed are full of confidence. they had the confidence before they began and that is why they succeeded. If you are not confident then you need to work out a way that makes you more confident in your trading. That may be trading at a smaller outlay. For example instead of $20K per trade try to use only $2K.

Good luck Investing.

Short Listed Companies for Consideration

here is a List of a few companys I think people should take a look at :

ASX: KRS - Kresta Holdings Limited running at a PE of 9.11. Current Prince 30c.

ASX:MCP - McPherson's Limited running at a PE of 9.57. Current Price $3.23

ASX:RHD - Ross Human Directions Limited running at a PE of 9.52. Current Price 60c

ASX:AHD - Amalgamated Holdings Limited running at a PE of 12.67. Current Price $6.59

ASX:CMV - CMA Corporation Limited running at a PE of 9.99. Current Price 50c

ASX:MXI - Maxitrans Industries Limited running at a PE of 12.09. Current Price 61c

ASX:LAU - Lindsay Australia Limited running at a PE of 10.76. Current Price 26c

ASX:TBG - Tutt Bryant Group Limited running at a PE of 11.32. Current Price $1.75

These companies passed my initial filters. From here each needs to be examined to see where it is going in the future, the debt/equity level, etc. But it is a good starting list.

Good Luck

The US sub-prime mortgage crisis has prompted the Australian Government to consider tightening regulation of the nation's lenders. A parliamentary committee has identified a need for stronger regulation of the lending sector, to ensure that predatory lenders do not cause a liquidity crisis in Australia. The committee has recommended giving the Australian Securities & Investments Commission the power to prosecute predatory lenders who prey on vulnerable consumers. The mortgage industry has welcomed the proposed changes, however the Financial Services Union has some concerns
Someone has to stop people lending money to those who can't afford to pay it. But it is the consumers fault in the end and I don't think we can lay blame on the lenders. Consumers should know whether or not they will be able to afford the mortgage they are getting into, I don't like the current "victim" mentality around the place that a lot of borrowers are taking.

It is their OWN fault if they did not anticipate interest rates rising.

This has caused so much instability in the market there may be a few good buys out there but they are still few and far between.

Good luck

SIMS to explore offshore

Australian scrap metal recycler, Sims Group, is discussing opportunities for overseas expansion. The company provided no details on discussions with prospects in Europe and North America. On 17 September 2007, it said that profit for the first quarter of 2007-08 was not likely to be above $60 million, a decline of 12 per cent. It expected strong metal prices to lift profit in the second quarter. Its share price fell by $A1.13 to $A32.01

SIMS has a good dividend yeild but is still overpriced at a PE of 16. I would not count of the earnings being lifted on supposed Metal price increases as they should have done much better this quarter with the curent prices. They are worth watching with a possible buy around $25.00

Good luck

Optus Is flat but is the outlook better ?

Singtel Optus has forecast flat earnings in spite of growing sales. On 17 September 2007, Optus predicted that sales growth would be between 2.5 per cent and three per cent in the year to 31 March 2008, above the industry average of about two per cent. EBITDA fell by 2.4 per cent to $A1.99 billion in 2006-07 and Optus does not expect to exceed this figure in 2007-08. Margins are declining because of the preference of mobile telephone customers for capped plans.

Is this going to be a longterm problem for optus ? My guess is no. they are building their customer base and although EBITDA fell this is an industry wide problem. the phone industry can be a hard place to make a few dollars but in order to reduce overhead costs you need a large customer base on which to spread it. Longer term optus has a good outlook in my opinion.

Rio mine to go ahead

Rio Tinto (ASX:RIO) has gained environmental support for an iron ore mine in the Pilbara in Western Australia. In March 2007, the WA Environmental Protection Authority rejected the resources company's plans for a $12 billion mine because of the risk to troglofauna. However, the WA Government directed it to reassess its decision. On 17 September, it gave clearance for the project. Rio Tinto will enlarge the mining exclusion zone so that more troglofauna habitat is protected. The decision has disappointed the WA Conservation Council.

It shows what a bit of money can do. The WA government will get a lot more revenue from this going ahead and therefore asked for it to be re reviewed. It must be said this is both a ethical and environmental issue and there may be a slight backlash to the go ahead.

But when you look at RIO you can't be disappointed with their return to shareholders. RIO is a stable resource company and while at a PE of 14 is a bit expensive, it is always worth watching this share

Channel Nine slow on uptake of Digital TV

Nine Network Australia has refused to disclose when it will launch a new high-definition digital channel. With Seven Network and Ten Network rolling out such new services in December 2007, Nine suggested it is making progress with a new high-definition offering, but said it has no announcement to make in regards to the issue. Goldman Sachs JBWere analysts said with ageing broadcast infrastructure, a limited number of quality programs and strained relationships with its broadcast partners, Nine is unlikely to immediately follow Seven and Ten in launching its digital channel

Nine is falling behind in the stakes to get the digital audience in the future. When you look at it, this may affect major contracts such as the Rugby league as these institutions will look for those companies that can offer the most to the viewers. This can only be seen as a negative for a company that is in a cut throat industry.

babcock and Brown Reorganisation

Australian investment bank Babcock & Brown (B&B) has announced a reorganisation of its assets. Babcock & Brown Wind Partners (ASX:BBW) will acquire control of more than 750 turbines in the US and Portugal from B&B for around $600 million. CEO, Miles George, said the transaction will reduce the impact of regional wind variability on its performance. The deal resulted in BBW upgrading forecast payouts to security holders by 16% to $0.145 per security in 2008 and $0.155 per security in 2009.

Anything that can stabilise the returns from a company has to commended. but was it worth 600 Million. In my opinion I can't justify the cost. But investors appear to have taken to it.

This company is heavy in debt and would be much better using the money to get the Debt to Equity ratio down to a managable level.

The only good thing I can see about this company is the dividend yeild is at 7.9% but this won't hold if they keep spending money.

Good luck.